Gratitude and Comments to Le Donne
This short response to Le Donne’s rebuttal attempts to return the conversation to the more relevant and troubling evidence of manufactured memory, by drawing attention to examples from the New Testament. It raises the serious question: if manufactured memories and historical memories are not qualita...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2013
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Jahr: 2013, Band: 11, Heft: 1, Seiten: 98-105 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Collective Memory
gospel reliability
historical Jesus
invented memory
memory
memory distortion
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Parallele Ausgabe: | Nicht-Elektronisch
|
| Zusammenfassung: | This short response to Le Donne’s rebuttal attempts to return the conversation to the more relevant and troubling evidence of manufactured memory, by drawing attention to examples from the New Testament. It raises the serious question: if manufactured memories and historical memories are not qualitatively different, then how are we to distinguish between them? And, by extension, what does this say about the reliability of memory and the gospels as memory? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
| Enthält: | In: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-01101006 |