The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano
This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the...
| Άλλοι τίτλοι: | Review and response: Kocku von Stuckrad's study on the scientification of religion |
|---|---|
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Zygon
Έτος: 2016, Τόμος: 51, Τεύχος: 4, Σελίδες: 1067-1071 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Religion and science
B discourse research B Naturalism B Knowledge |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the article underscores the plurality and hybridity of knowledge systems, which is the main topic of the book under review. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Αναφορά: | Kritik von "(Pseudo)Science, Religious Beliefs, and Historiography (2016)"
|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12305 |