The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano
This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the...
| Другие заглавия: | Review and response: Kocku von Stuckrad's study on the scientification of religion |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| В: |
Zygon
Год: 2016, Том: 51, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 1067-1071 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Religion and science
B discourse research B Naturalism B Knowledge |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This article responds to Leonardo Ambasciano's review of The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800-2000 by Kocku von Stuckrad. It criticizes a narrative that presents naturalism and science as the ultimate system of knowledge. Contesting this rhetoric, the article underscores the plurality and hybridity of knowledge systems, which is the main topic of the book under review. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "(Pseudo)Science, Religious Beliefs, and Historiography (2016)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12305 |