Das marcionitische Evangelium und die (Text-)Überlieferung der Evangelien
In his huge and ambitious study Das älteste Evangelium und die Entstehung der kanonischen Evangelien Matthias Klinghardt undertakes a large scale effort at integrating the literary and the textual history of the canonical gospel tradition. A crucial part in this study is the reconstruction and the a...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Alemão |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
De Gruyter
2017
|
| Em: |
Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
Ano: 2017, Volume: 21, Número: 1, Páginas: 90-109 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Marcion, Sinopensis, Evangelho
/ Bibel. Lukasevangelium
/ Bibel
/ Cânon
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | BF Gnose HC Novo Testamento KAB Cristianismo primitivo |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Marcion’s Gospel
Luke’s Gospel
text tradition (P45, P75, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05)
Canonical Gospels
Teststellen
|
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Resumo: | In his huge and ambitious study Das älteste Evangelium und die Entstehung der kanonischen Evangelien Matthias Klinghardt undertakes a large scale effort at integrating the literary and the textual history of the canonical gospel tradition. A crucial part in this study is the reconstruction and the assessment of the Gospel from Marcion’s canon. Contrary to what the Church Fathers claim Klinghardt takes Marcion’s Gospel as the most important witness to the earliest gospel writing ever. In his analysis the three main sources for Marcion’s Gospel (Tertullian, Epiphanius, and Adamantius) represent three different copies of the Marcionite gospel text and are as such indicative of a text tradition that spans close to 200 years. Klinghardt studies the textual developments between the three copies and finds that where there is overlapping text between them they differ in 60% of the cases. Moreover, he claims that this level of disparity is also found in the canonical text tradition. The present paper examines this claim by studying seven manuscripts of canonical Luke (P45, P75, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05) from the same period and finds that the average level of agreement between any three is about 78%. Even the three manuscripts that are the textually most unique (P45, 01, 05) agree on average about 62% of the times. Hence, a level of agreement between the three witnesses to Marcion’s Gospel as reconstructed by Klinghardt of less than 50% is unparalleled. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-961X |
| Obras secundárias: | In: Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/zac-2017-0006 |