Chalcedon Defended: A Pluralistic Re-Reading of the Two-Natures Doctrine
Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking w...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Sage
2006
|
Στο/Στη: |
The expository times
Έτος: 2006, Τόμος: 118, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 113-119 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Incarnation
B Religious Diversity B Christology B Hick, John, 1922-2012 B theology of religions B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism B Jesus Christ Person & offices B Theology of religions (Christian theology) B Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Σύνοψη: | Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking which preserves the essence of a double-nature teaching. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5308 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: The expository times
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0014524606072689 |