Chalcedon Defended: A Pluralistic Re-Reading of the Two-Natures Doctrine
Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking w...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sage
2006
|
| Dans: |
The expository times
Année: 2006, Volume: 118, Numéro: 3, Pages: 113-119 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Incarnation
B Religious Diversity B Christology B Hick, John, 1922-2012 B Religion B theology of religions B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism B Jesus Christ Person & offices B Theology of religions (Christian theology) |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking which preserves the essence of a double-nature teaching. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5308 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The expository times
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0014524606072689 |