Chalcedon Defended: A Pluralistic Re-Reading of the Two-Natures Doctrine
Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking w...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Sage
2006
|
| Em: |
The expository times
Ano: 2006, Volume: 118, Número: 3, Páginas: 113-119 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Incarnation
B Religious Diversity B Christology B Hick, John, 1922-2012 B Religião B theology of religions B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism B Jesus Christ Person & offices B Theology of religions (Christian theology) |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking which preserves the essence of a double-nature teaching. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5308 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: The expository times
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0014524606072689 |