Chalcedon Defended: A Pluralistic Re-Reading of the Two-Natures Doctrine
Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking w...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
2006
|
| В: |
The expository times
Год: 2006, Том: 118, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 113-119 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Incarnation
B Religious Diversity B Christology B Hick, John, 1922-2012 B Религия (мотив) B theology of religions B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism B Jesus Christ Person & offices B Theology of religions (Christian theology) |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking which preserves the essence of a double-nature teaching. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5308 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: The expository times
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0014524606072689 |