Chalcedon Defended: A Pluralistic Re-Reading of the Two-Natures Doctrine
Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking w...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Sage
2006
|
| In: |
The expository times
Year: 2006, 卷: 118, 發布: 3, Pages: 113-119 |
| Further subjects: | B
Incarnation
B Religious Diversity B Christology B Hick, John, 1922-2012 B 宗教 B theology of religions B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism B Jesus Christ Person & offices B Theology of religions (Christian theology) |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | Is Christian belief in incarnation compatible with a pluralistic theology of religions? After a discussion of John Hick's criticism of Chalcedonian Christology the article argues that religious pluralism is not only compatible with, but could and should retain a form of incarnational thinking which preserves the essence of a double-nature teaching. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5308 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The expository times
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0014524606072689 |