Telescope + Mirror = Reflections on the Cosmos: Umberto Eco and the Image of Religion

Umberto Eco argues that a mirror image is not a sign. At best it is a double, a thing that ceases to be once the reflected object is removed. Harry Mulisch narratively suggests that mirror images function metaphorically as gateways between human suffering and the divine. And interestingly, science e...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Peters, Benjamin John (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Wiley-Blackwell [2017]
In: Zygon
Year: 2017, 卷: 52, 發布: 2, Pages: 343-360
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Eco, Umberto 1932-2016 / Mulisch, Harry 1927-2010 / Peirce, Charles S. 1839-1914 / Spiegelbild / 宇宙 / 折射望远镜 / 宇宙論
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
Further subjects:B Umberto Eco
B Charles Sanders Peirce
B Science
B Cosmology
B Perception
B 宗教
B Aesthetics
B Hermeneutics
B Semiotics
B Divinity
B Meaning
在線閱讀: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
實物特徵
總結:Umberto Eco argues that a mirror image is not a sign. At best it is a double, a thing that ceases to be once the reflected object is removed. Harry Mulisch narratively suggests that mirror images function metaphorically as gateways between human suffering and the divine. And interestingly, science employs mirrors and mirror images both to turn our gaze upwards and to show us reflections of our place in the cosmos. Tying together Eco's notion of the double, Mulisch's insistence that mirror images reflect humanity's construction of the divine, and the Giant Magellan Telescope Project's cosmic images, it is my contention that modern, telescopic mirror images are much more than snapshots of the cosmos. They are constructions of human and divine meaning that—signifying—pose the question, what is reflected: the cosmos or humanity?
ISSN:1467-9744
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12337