Posterity or Prosperity?: Critiquing and Refiguring Prosperity Theologies in an Ecological Age

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, prosperity theologies have simultaneously received a warm reception by some and a critical cold shoulder by others. With emotive responses provoked on both sides, what cannot be ignored is the influence prosperity thinking has, and will have, on the glob...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Swoboda, A.J. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2015
Dans: Pneuma
Année: 2015, Volume: 37, Numéro: 3, Pages: 394-411
Classifications IxTheo:KDG Église libre
NCE Éthique des affaires
NCG Éthique de la création; Éthique environnementale
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ecotheology prosperity theology environment Pentecostalism ecology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:At the beginning of the twenty-first century, prosperity theologies have simultaneously received a warm reception by some and a critical cold shoulder by others. With emotive responses provoked on both sides, what cannot be ignored is the influence prosperity thinking has, and will have, on the global church. Yet, little to no attention has been devoted to the intersection between prosperity theology and the issues surrounding the ecological crisis, such as climate change, environmental degradation, human greed, and wanton consumerism. Does such an intersection exist? This article explores this question by contrasting prosperity theology’s divine economy and agrarianism’s great economy. In sum, it suggests that the uncritical reception of prosperity teachings—though they speak pointedly to real, felt human needs—can ultimately create ecologically harmful, if not anti-ecological, modes of thinking and living within its adherents.
ISSN:1570-0747
Contient:In: Pneuma
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700747-03703002