Quranic Studies, part IV: Some methodological notes
In this article I will focus upon authors who have suggested basic methodological challenges to the assumptions of Wansbrough's approach to the Muslim interpretative tradition found in part IV of his book, Quranic Studies. A common objection arises to Wansbrough's insistence on having text...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
1997
|
| В: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Год: 1997, Том: 9, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 39-46 |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | In this article I will focus upon authors who have suggested basic methodological challenges to the assumptions of Wansbrough's approach to the Muslim interpretative tradition found in part IV of his book, Quranic Studies. A common objection arises to Wansbrough's insistence on having textual evidence for historical claims and his seeing those texts which do provide historical evidence as complex expressions of several generations of editors. Two works, one an article by Issa Boullata and the other, a book by C.H.M. Versteegh, will be dealt with in some detail in this paper in order to clarify the issues which are at stake. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/157006897X00043 |