Paul Helm on Medieval Scholasticism

Berkouwer and Pinnock embraced deterministic Calvinism when they were young theologians. However, later on they started to revolt against the ‘Calvinism’ of their youth and Dort. Paul Helm never joined or affirmed this uprising. It is not that I revolt against Dort, but I defend that Reformed schola...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Journal of reformed theology
Autor principal: Vos, Antonie 1944- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Brill 2014
Em: Journal of reformed theology
Ano: 2014, Volume: 8, Número: 3, Páginas: 263-283
Classificações IxTheo:FA Teologia
KAC Idade Média
KAG Reforma
KDD Igreja evangélica 
Outras palavras-chave:B Historical Theology Reformed medieval scholasticism
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Verlag)
Descrição
Resumo:Berkouwer and Pinnock embraced deterministic Calvinism when they were young theologians. However, later on they started to revolt against the ‘Calvinism’ of their youth and Dort. Paul Helm never joined or affirmed this uprising. It is not that I revolt against Dort, but I defend that Reformed scholasticism, including Dort, was never a kind of theological necessitarianism—this in contrast with John Calvin’s theology. Instead, classic Reformed scholasticism offers us a theology of contingency and individuality, of goodness and will, and of freedom and grace. Rediscovering this comforting historical reality is a gift and a joy. Helm argues that he cannot embrace this viewpoint. However, this present contribution demonstrates that he misinterprets the core structure and the medieval foundation of classic Reformed theology and philosophy. It is the latter that form the basis of Reformed systematic theology and the necessity-contingency, the synchrony-diachrony, as the necessity of the consequence-consequent and the secundum compositionem/divisionem distinctions show.
ISSN:1569-7312
Obras secundárias:In: Journal of reformed theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15697312-00803003