“Ihr habt die Blasphemie gehört!ˮ (Mk 14:64): Warum der Hohe Rat in Jerusalem auf den Tod Jesu hinwirkte
Which were the reasons for Sanhedrin in Jerusalem to work towards Jesus’ death? The article discusses the methodical difficulties of answering this question, taking into account the literary features of the passion narratives. It expounds the thesis that Jesus was accused of being a pseudo-prophet –...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Allemand |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2016
|
| Dans: |
Novum Testamentum
Année: 2016, Volume: 58, Numéro: 3, Pages: 233-258 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Bibel. Markusevangelium 14,64
B Passion Narratives trial of Jesus titulus crucis blasphemy Deuteronomy Qumran |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
| Résumé: | Which were the reasons for Sanhedrin in Jerusalem to work towards Jesus’ death? The article discusses the methodical difficulties of answering this question, taking into account the literary features of the passion narratives. It expounds the thesis that Jesus was accused of being a pseudo-prophet – his feature being “presumption” (zadôn) (Deut 17:12f.; 18:20, 22f.; Num 15:30). Texts found in Qumran referring to Deuteronomy (4Q 375 frg. 1; 11QT etc.) include this crime punished with a death sentence. Jesus being accused of blasphemy due to confessing to be Messiah is definitively secondary. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5365 |
| Contient: | In: Novum Testamentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685365-12341527 |