Religion, Terrorism and Speech in a ‘Post-Charlie Hebdo’ World
This article reviews the policy responses and the freedom of expression case law following the Charlie Hebdo attack. It unpacks the ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ frame-work from a freedom of expression standpoint and analyses court decisions related to glorification of terrorism and incitement to h...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2015
|
| Dans: |
Religion and human rights
Année: 2015, Volume: 10, Numéro: 3, Pages: 207-228 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Charlie Hebdo attack
terrorism
countering violent extremism
incitement to violence
religious hatred
glorification of terrorism
International Convention for Civil and Political Rights
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article reviews the policy responses and the freedom of expression case law following the Charlie Hebdo attack. It unpacks the ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ frame-work from a freedom of expression standpoint and analyses court decisions related to glorification of terrorism and incitement to hatred with a particular focus on France and the United States as well as Russia, and Scandinavia. It shows the determination of governments to tackle the non-violent “ideological” bases of “terrorism”, and to treat religion as largely a public order issue. It concludes that in a post-Charlie Hebdo world, courts also have taken short cuts, instrumentalising not only speech to perceived higher needs, but judicial reasoning and practices as well. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Contient: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12341288 |