Epistemological Ambivalence: Richard Rorty on Religion and Public Discourse
The late Richard Rorty famously argued that faith-based positions grounded in comprehensive worldviews or unassailable texts served as ‘conversation-stoppers’ and should be excluded from the public sphere. This article argues that Rorty’s position flies in the face of his own postmodern epistemology...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2017
|
| В: |
International journal of public theology
Год: 2017, Том: 11, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 88-109 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии VB Герменевтика ; Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Epistemology
public square
postmodernism
Deweyian progressivism
Wittgenstein
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | The late Richard Rorty famously argued that faith-based positions grounded in comprehensive worldviews or unassailable texts served as ‘conversation-stoppers’ and should be excluded from the public sphere. This article argues that Rorty’s position flies in the face of his own postmodern epistemology as well as his insistence on the humility and virtues that should attend the collective pursuit of the social good. It suggests that there are two Rortys at work and that his epistemological ambivalence undermines the force of his argument. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1569-7320 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: International journal of public theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15697320-12341473 |