What if We Got Rid of the Goy: Rereading Ancient Jewish Distinctions
The goy has been present in Jewish discourses since antiquity. Despite this, its birth and history have received almost no scholarly attention. In this paper we shift the focus from the various historical attitudes towards the goy, to the very constitution of the concept and the dichotomy it constru...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of Judaism
Year: 2016, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 149-182 |
| Further subjects: | B
Gentiles
Bible
Second Temple
Jewish-Hellenism
rabbinic literature
Paul
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562013300 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141801.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700631-12340458 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562013300 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492013306 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492013306 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1017479682 |0 (DE-627)676408974 |0 (DE-576)353808660 |4 aut |a Rozen-Tsevi, Yishai |d 1971- | |
| 109 | |a Rozen-Tsevi, Yishai 1971- |a Rozen Tsevi, Ishai 1971- |a Ṣevi, Yišai Rozen- 1971- |a Tsevi, Ishai Rozen 1971- |a Rosen-Zvi, Ishay 1971- |a Rozen-Ṣevi, Yišai 1971- |a Tsevi, Yishai Rozen- 1971- |a Zvi, Ishay Rosen- 1971- |a Rozen Tsevi, Yishai 1971- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What if We Got Rid of the Goy |b Rereading Ancient Jewish Distinctions |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The goy has been present in Jewish discourses since antiquity. Despite this, its birth and history have received almost no scholarly attention. In this paper we shift the focus from the various historical attitudes towards the goy, to the very constitution of the concept and the dichotomy it constructs. We claim that scholars have been anachronistically reading Jewish (or Judaean) texts from the centuries before the common era as if they contained the Jew/goy distinction. Through a series of readings in texts like Jubilees, Pseudo-Aristeas, Joseph and Aseneth, 1-4 Maccabees, the Damascus Document, we seek to demonstrate the plurality of options for separation that existed before the Jew/goy discourse took over. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Gentiles |x Bible |x Second Temple |x Jewish-Hellenism |x rabbinic literature |x Paul | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal for the study of Judaism |d Leiden : Brill, 1970 |g 47(2016), 2, Seite 149-182 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341345121 |w (DE-600)2067223-8 |w (DE-576)099211033 |x 1570-0631 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:149-182 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1650651333 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700631-12340458 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 47 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 149-182 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976870098 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562013300 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150920 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||