Reformed Soteriology in Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments
Johannes Climacus, pseudonymous author of Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments, presents to his reader the “absolute paradox.” Though initially presented in terms of Socratic and Un-Socratic theories of knowledge, this paper argues that Climacus’ paradox is concerned with the tension between soteri...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Journal of reformed theology
Year: 2016, Volume: 10, Issue: 2, Pages: 129-147 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KDD Protestant Church NBK Soteriology TJ Modern history VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Soteriology
Calvinism
Kierkegaard
Climacus
absolute paradox
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562033034 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141853.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15697312-01002014 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562033034 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)49203303X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ49203303X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chapa, Joseph O. |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reformed Soteriology in Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Johannes Climacus, pseudonymous author of Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments, presents to his reader the “absolute paradox.” Though initially presented in terms of Socratic and Un-Socratic theories of knowledge, this paper argues that Climacus’ paradox is concerned with the tension between soteriological claims about human agency and divine sovereignty. Does man choose God? Or does God choose man? Though Climacus draws stark contrasts between the Socratic and the Un-Socratic, he goes to great lengths to retain them both. Through Climacus’ synthesis, Kierkegaard demonstrates his acceptance of free will and determinism as an uneasy unity—a kind of unstable equilibrium. This view of Fragments results in an emphasis on human agency that is affirmed in the broader Kierkegaardian corpus: Rather than being paralyzed by one’s inability to fathom the absolute paradox, Kierkegaard insists that one move forward in spite of the paradox, take the leap, and do Christianity. | ||
| 601 | |a Soteriologie | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 601 | |a Fragment | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Soteriology |x Calvinism |x Kierkegaard |x Climacus |x absolute paradox | |
| 652 | |a KDD:NBK:TJ:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of reformed theology |d Leiden : Brill, 2007 |g 10(2016), 2, Seite 129-147 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)529765632 |w (DE-600)2316050-0 |w (DE-576)306834308 |x 1569-7312 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:129-147 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15697312-01002014 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 10 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 129-147 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976889791 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562033034 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180406111216 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050047 |a KDD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053909 |a TJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||