The Hard and the Soft
Politics has never been considered Martin Buber’s forte. This paper considers the range of Buber’s reception as a political thinker by considering it in the form of three “moments,” each from a different point in his career, and each through the eyes of a different figure who either read or worked w...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Brill
2017
|
| En: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Año: 2017, Volumen: 25, Número: 1, Páginas: 72-94 |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Anarchism
Martin Buber
political theory
reception history
Zionism
|
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Sumario: | Politics has never been considered Martin Buber’s forte. This paper considers the range of Buber’s reception as a political thinker by considering it in the form of three “moments,” each from a different point in his career, and each through the eyes of a different figure who either read or worked with Buber politically: Theodor Herzl, Gustav Landauer, and Hans Kohn. The three moments are structured around a discussion of the classic criticism that Buber’s politics are naïve or utopian; the paper seeks to respond, as Buber did, in a way that raises questions about the borders of politics itself. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-285X |
| Obras secundarias: | In: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341278 |