Provoked to Saving Jealousy: Reading Romans 9–11 as Theological Performance
The history of interpretation indicates that Christian interpretations take Romans 9–11 as a single, coherently designed statement of doctrine. There are, of course, disagreements within the consensus, but most readers seem to share two basic assumptions: (1) the apostle had a particular point to ma...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Pneuma
Jahr: 2016, Band: 38, Heft: 1/2, Seiten: 180-192 |
| IxTheo Notationen: | HC Neues Testament NBK Soteriologie NBL Prädestinationslehre |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Romans 9–11
soteriology
Pauline theology
election/predestination
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The history of interpretation indicates that Christian interpretations take Romans 9–11 as a single, coherently designed statement of doctrine. There are, of course, disagreements within the consensus, but most readers seem to share two basic assumptions: (1) the apostle had a particular point to make, which he crafted with perfect success, and (2) a good reading of the passage discovers that point and makes it understandable so it can be used to build or support a particular Christian teaching. At an angle to that tradition, I want to suggest that Romans 9–11 can perhaps also (if not more) fruitfully be read not as a tidy doctrinal treatise but as a torrid theological performance, a transfiguring work of art staged as a series of rhetorical moves and countermoves that in the end leaves us not with nothing but with more than we dared to imagine possible. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0747 |
| Enthält: | In: Pneuma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700747-03801014 |