From lingua franca to lingua sacra: The Scripturalization of Tobit in 4QTobe
In light of the growing consensus that the book of Tobit was originally penned in Aramaic, the fragmentary Hebrew copy 4QTobe is a singularly unique literary artifact of Second Temple Judaism. While a cluster of other Aramaic works were read and received as authoritative literature by at least some...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Vetus Testamentum
Year: 2016, 卷: 66, 发布: 1, Pages: 117-132 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bibel. Tobit
/ 翻译
/ 希伯来语
/ 4Q200
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament HD Early Judaism |
| Further subjects: | B
Tobit
Dead Sea Scrolls
Aramaic
Hebrew
apocrypha
literary editions
|
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| 总结: | In light of the growing consensus that the book of Tobit was originally penned in Aramaic, the fragmentary Hebrew copy 4QTobe is a singularly unique literary artifact of Second Temple Judaism. While a cluster of other Aramaic works were read and received as authoritative literature by at least some Jews at this time (e.g., Daniel 2-7, the booklets of 1 Enoch, and Aramaic Levi Document), Tobit alone was translated from the common language of the ancient Near East into the traditional Israelite mother tongue. This study explores how the shift from Aramaic to Hebrew should inform our conception of the status and reception of Tobit in ancient Judaism. By virtue of the new linguistic overlay given to 4QTobe, this manuscript should be considered a literary edition in its own right, with an ostensibly higher level or different degree of authority than its Aramaic language counterparts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5330 |
| Contains: | In: Vetus Testamentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685330-12301228 |