Brotherhood, Solidarity, and the Rabbinic Construction of the Commandment to Return Lost Property

The present article discusses the biblical commandment to return lost property (hashavat aveda) and the manner by which it is treated by the early rabbinic tradition. I argue that it is possible to read the two passages in the Torah in which the commandment is mentioned (Ex. 23:4–5; Deut. 23:1–5) as...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schremer, Adiel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2014
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2014, Volume: 3, Issue: 1, Pages: 51-61
Further subjects:B return of lost property solidarity care for others legal interpretation Tannaitic midrash emotions in law
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562244744
003 DE-627
005 20220604142757.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22124810-00301003  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562244744 
035 |a (DE-576)49224474X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ49224474X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schremer, Adiel  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Brotherhood, Solidarity, and the Rabbinic Construction of the Commandment to Return Lost Property 
264 1 |c 2014 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The present article discusses the biblical commandment to return lost property (hashavat aveda) and the manner by which it is treated by the early rabbinic tradition. I argue that it is possible to read the two passages in the Torah in which the commandment is mentioned (Ex. 23:4–5; Deut. 23:1–5) as an attempt at constructing an ethical stance of unselfishness, in which the other and the other’s loss are given priority over one’s selfish instincts. To this end, the Torah uses the rhetoric of brotherhood, intended to stimulate feelings of solidarity and to encourage members of the community to treat each other with empathy, care, and compassion. However, most of the legal discussions of the commandment in early rabbinic literature favored a legalistic interpretation of the Torah rhetoric, according to which the use of the word “brother” was meant to delineate the scope of the commandment, that is, to specify whose lost property a Jew is commanded to return and whose not, rather than to induce sentiments of compassion and solidarity. I suggest that although this line of interpretation stems from a deep rabbinic refusal to accept the interpretive possibility that the commandment to return lost property includes non-Jews, it also reflects a broader rabbinic tendency to deny a role in halakhic discourse to emotions. 
650 4 |a return of lost property  |x solidarity  |x care for others  |x legal interpretation  |x Tannaitic midrash  |x emotions in law 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of law, religion and state  |d Leiden : Brill, 2012  |g 3(2014), 1, Seite 51-61  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)796586713  |w (DE-600)2783973-4  |w (DE-576)414227638  |x 2212-4810  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2014  |g number:1  |g pages:51-61 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22124810-00301003  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 3  |j 2014  |e 1  |h 51-61 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977102280 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562244744 
LOK |0 005 20170808151702 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL