Male Obstetric Competence in Ancient Israel

According to two recent sociological studies on childbirth in the OT, the (androcentric) OT displays both insensitivity to the parturient and ignorance of the basics of parturition. One of the studies specifies that the biblical authors were unaware of the normally presenting fetal member, the head....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Makujina, John ca. Ende 20. Jh./Anfang 21. Jh. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Brill 2016
En: Vetus Testamentum
Año: 2016, Volumen: 66, Número: 1, Páginas: 78-94
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Bibel. Altes Testament / Parto / Saber
Clasificaciones IxTheo:HB Antiguo Testamento
NBE Antropología
Otras palabras clave:B Childbirth death in childbirth (Gen 35:16-20 1 Sam 4:19-22) Isa 26:18 37:3 Hos 13:13 Ps 22:10-11
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Verlag)
Descripción
Sumario:According to two recent sociological studies on childbirth in the OT, the (androcentric) OT displays both insensitivity to the parturient and ignorance of the basics of parturition. One of the studies specifies that the biblical authors were unaware of the normally presenting fetal member, the head. The present article, however, comes to decidedly different conclusions: 1) the position that the Israelite male was insensitive to women experiencing childbirth either goes beyond the available evidence or is a distortion thereof; 2) both studies overlook information that undermines their conclusions; and 3) the OT authors were sufficiently aware of the fundamentals of childbirth.
Notas:Nimmt auch Bezug auf "Menstruation and childbirth in the Bible" von Tarja S. Philip
ISSN:1568-5330
Reference:Kritik von "The Influence of Realia on Biblical Depictions of Childbirth (2011)"
Obras secundarias:In: Vetus Testamentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685330-12301221