The Binding of Abraham: Inverting the Akedah in Fail-Safe and WarGames
This article draws upon Søren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling and Jacques Derrida's The Gift of Death to trace how two exemplars of atomic bomb cinema reinterpret the Binding of Isaac (Akedah). Released during the twin peaks of Cold War tension, Fail-Safe (1964) and WarGames (1983) invert...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
2015
|
| Dans: |
The journal of religion and film
Année: 2015, Volume: 19, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-29 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Lumet, Sidney 1924-2011
/ Fail-Safe
/ Badham, John 1939-
/ WarGames
/ Abrahams Opfer
/ Kierkegaard, Søren 1813-1855, Frygt og bæven
/ Derrida, Jacques 1930-2004, Donner la mort
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | HB Ancien Testament VA Philosophie ZG Sociologie des médias; médias numériques; Sciences de l'information et de la communication |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Fail-Safe
WarGames
Cold War Cinema
Atomic Bomb Cinema
Akedah
Aqedah
Genesis 22
Sacrifice
Abraham and Isaac
Fear and Trembling
Kierkegaard
Derrida
The Gift of Death
Norman Morrison
George Segal
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article draws upon Søren Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling and Jacques Derrida's The Gift of Death to trace how two exemplars of atomic bomb cinema reinterpret the Binding of Isaac (Akedah). Released during the twin peaks of Cold War tension, Fail-Safe (1964) and WarGames (1983) invert the Akedah of Genesis 22. In both films, an act of sacrificial patricide accompanies or replaces the sacrifice of an Isaac-like son. When viewed in the context of Cold War cultural politics—events such as Norman Morrison’s Abrahamic self-immolation and Kent State’s rejection of George Segal’s sacrificial memorial— the inverted Akedah emerges as a subversive reflection of its traditional form. If, as some scholars argue, the traditional Akedah has been used during wartime to justify sacrificial filicide and further nationalist fervour, its inversion becomes a trope of resistance and protest against the intergenerational annihilation of global nuclear war. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1092-1311 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The journal of religion and film
|