‘Come with Old Khayyam and Leave the Wise to Talk’
In the last thirty years, many ecophilosophies have come and gone. Visions of ecological reform and re-alignment have been rolling plentifully off the presses. Yet the ecological crisis, globally and at home, has only worsened. Why have ecophilosophical ideas failed to change social patterns of beha...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2017
|
| In: |
Worldviews
Year: 2017, Volume: 21, Issue: 3, Pages: 218-234 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Philosophy
/ Ecology
/ Theory
/ Benefit
/ Environmental protection
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBD Doctrine of Creation NBE Anthropology NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
ontopoetics
theory as change agent
academic philosophy as cultural expression
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1565004000 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221020123518.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 171106s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15685357-02103002 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1565004000 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)495004006 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ495004006 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)13193922X |0 (DE-627)707783534 |0 (DE-576)167952765 |4 aut |a Mathews, Freya |d 1949- | |
| 109 | |a Mathews, Freya 1949- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘Come with Old Khayyam and Leave the Wise to Talk’ |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the last thirty years, many ecophilosophies have come and gone. Visions of ecological reform and re-alignment have been rolling plentifully off the presses. Yet the ecological crisis, globally and at home, has only worsened. Why have ecophilosophical ideas failed to change social patterns of behaviour to any significant degree? Can theory change behaviour? Or is theory itself the problem? Is it theory which distances us from reality and thereby creates the moral gap between ourselves and the biosphere? If so, what contribution can philosophers and scholars possibly make towards an effective response to the current biosphere emergency? | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a ontopoetics |x theory as change agent |x academic philosophy as cultural expression | |
| 652 | |a NBD:NBE:NCG:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |0 (DE-627)106200259 |0 (DE-576)209066873 |2 gnd |a Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4043207-5 |0 (DE-627)104434910 |0 (DE-576)209054700 |2 gnd |a Ökologie |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059787-8 |0 (DE-627)106142275 |0 (DE-576)209132256 |2 gnd |a Theorie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4172187-1 |0 (DE-627)10538903X |0 (DE-576)209941731 |2 gnd |a Nutzen |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4061644-7 |0 (DE-627)106134965 |0 (DE-576)209140690 |2 gnd |a Umweltschutz |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Worldviews |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1997 |g 21(2017), 3, Seite 218-234 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)325567123 |w (DE-600)2036957-8 |w (DE-576)098474359 |x 1568-5357 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:218-234 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685357-02103002 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 21 |j 2017 |e 3 |h 218-234 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2986406491 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1565004000 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221020123518 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 171106||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051531 |a NBD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052988 |a NCG | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Benefit,Ecology,Environmental balance,Ecology in literature,Ecology in art,Environmental protection,Ecology,Environmental protection in art,Environmental protection in literature,Philosophy,Philosophy in literature,Theory |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Avantage,Utilité,Utilité,Philosophie,Philosophie,Protection de l'environnement,Théorie,Écologie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ecología,Filosofía,Filosofía,Protección del medio ambiente,Teoría,Utilidad |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Ambientalismo,Ecologia,Filosofia,Filosofia,Teoria,Utile |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 哲学,效益,用处,充分利用,环境保护,环保,理论,生态学 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 哲學,效益,用處,充分利用,理論,環境保護,環保,生態學 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ecologia,Filosofia,Filosofia,Proteção ao meio ambiente,Teoria,Utilidade |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Выгода,Использование,Защита окружающей среды,Теория,Философия (мотив),Философия,Экология |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Όφελος,Θεωρία,Οικολογία,Προστασία του περιβάλλοντος,Περιβαλλοντική προστασία,Φιλοσοφία (μοτίβο),Φιλοσοφία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Philosophy,Philosophieren , Umweltprobleme - Ökologie,Umweltbiologie , Theorien,Theorien , Umweltprobleme - Umweltschutz,Ökologie,Umweltvorsorge |