‘Come with Old Khayyam and Leave the Wise to Talk’
In the last thirty years, many ecophilosophies have come and gone. Visions of ecological reform and re-alignment have been rolling plentifully off the presses. Yet the ecological crisis, globally and at home, has only worsened. Why have ecophilosophical ideas failed to change social patterns of beha...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2017
|
| В: |
Worldviews
Год: 2017, Том: 21, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 218-234 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Философия (мотив)
/ Экология
/ Теория
/ Выгода
/ Защита окружающей среды
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | NBD Сотворение мира NBE Антропология NCG Экологическая этика; этика мироздания VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
ontopoetics
theory as change agent
academic philosophy as cultural expression
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | In the last thirty years, many ecophilosophies have come and gone. Visions of ecological reform and re-alignment have been rolling plentifully off the presses. Yet the ecological crisis, globally and at home, has only worsened. Why have ecophilosophical ideas failed to change social patterns of behaviour to any significant degree? Can theory change behaviour? Or is theory itself the problem? Is it theory which distances us from reality and thereby creates the moral gap between ourselves and the biosphere? If so, what contribution can philosophers and scholars possibly make towards an effective response to the current biosphere emergency? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5357 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: Worldviews
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685357-02103002 |