Ethics and Value in Naess’ Ecophilosophy

It appears that Naess thought his ecophilosophy could do without ethics. What made him think so? Since Naess was largely implicit about his metaethical views, I turn to Warwick Fox’ elaborate presentation of Naess’ ecophilosophy to find an answer. Doing so allows me to investigate what is insufficie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Vetlesen, Arne Johan 1960- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2017
In: Worldviews
Jahr: 2017, Band: 21, Heft: 3, Seiten: 251-261
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Næss, Arne 1912-2009 / Fox, Warwick 1954- / Tiefenökologie / Ethik / Moral
IxTheo Notationen:NCB Individualethik
NCG Ökologische Ethik; Schöpfungsethik
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Ethics ontological presuppositions of Naess’ philosophy realist notion value
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It appears that Naess thought his ecophilosophy could do without ethics. What made him think so? Since Naess was largely implicit about his metaethical views, I turn to Warwick Fox’ elaborate presentation of Naess’ ecophilosophy to find an answer. Doing so allows me to investigate what is insufficiently accounted for in Naess’ ecophilosophy, namely its ontological presuppositions. To be philosophically sound, Naess’ criticisms of ethics need to question the taboo against the so-called naturalistic fallacy, a commonplace in ethical theories since Hume. I argue that a realist notion of value—understood as a property of nature, operative in nature—provides ecophilosophy with a sorely needed ontological foundation.
ISSN:1568-5357
Enthält:In: Worldviews
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685357-02103004