Religious Symbols and State Regulation

Religious symbols are historically significant and socially powerful. They have many forms and functions. Their legal regulation presents difficult challenges for courts, particularly international courts. This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has approached the regulation of...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: McGoldrick, Dominic (Author)
格式: 电子 文件
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill, Nijhoff 2017
In: Religion and human rights
Year: 2017, 卷: 12, 发布: 2/3, Pages: 128-141
Further subjects:B 宗教 religious symbols religious dress secularism discrimination margin of appreciation European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) European Convention on Human Rights (echr)
在线阅读: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
实物特征
总结:Religious symbols are historically significant and socially powerful. They have many forms and functions. Their legal regulation presents difficult challenges for courts, particularly international courts. This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has approached the regulation of the regulation of religious symbols by national jurisdictions. It submits that the fundamental touchstone of the Court’s jurisprudence lies in its approach to secularism. It has accepted secularism as consistent with the values underpinning the Convention. This is a strategic and sensible approach. There are limits imposed by the prohibitions on discrimination and indoctrination. Beyond secularism there have been tentative steps towards a balancing / reasonable accommodation approach but the Court appreciates that the balances are difficult ones on which reasonable people, and even reasonable states, may legitimately disagree.
ISSN:1871-0328
Contains:In: Religion and human rights
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231155