The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious
The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommo...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2017
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Religion and human rights
Έτος: 2017, Τόμος: 12, Τεύχος: 2/3, Σελίδες: 153-163 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
freedom of expression
freedom of religion
pluralism
veil
religious expression
religious symbols
Ισλάμ (μοτίβο)
|
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Σύνοψη: | The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommodated (and justified) these different ideas through a focus on democratic pluralism (not religious pluralism), a conception of pluralism which makes religion (including in its diverse expressions) subservient to democratic principles. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231154 |