The Expression of Religious Beliefs: In the Name of Pluralism, although Not Quite Religious
The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommo...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2017
|
| В: |
Religion and human rights
Год: 2017, Том: 12, Выпуск: 2/3, Страницы: 153-163 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
freedom of expression
freedom of religion
pluralism
veil
religious expression
religious symbols
Ислам (мотив)
|
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | The 25 years’ jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the intersection between expression and religion reveals that three main ideas of religion have coexisted alongside each other, for many decades predating the current era. The jurisprudence also shows that the Court somehow accommodated (and justified) these different ideas through a focus on democratic pluralism (not religious pluralism), a conception of pluralism which makes religion (including in its diverse expressions) subservient to democratic principles. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Второстепенные работы: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231154 |