Limitations on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Quarter Century since Its Judgment in Kokkinakis v. Greece

The manifestation of religious beliefs under Article 9 the European Convention on Human Rights is not absolute but may be subject to prescribed limitations. This article discusses the nature and extent of those limitations, as interpreted in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights from it...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hill, Mark (Author) ; Barnes, Katherine (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill, Nijhoff 2017
In: Religion and human rights
Year: 2017, Volume: 12, Issue: 2/3, Pages: 174-197
Further subjects:B Kokkinakis freedom of religion Article 9 limitations public order rights and freedoms of others margin of appreciation European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) European Convention on Human Rights (echr)
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 156500664X
003 DE-627
005 20220604143343.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171106s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/18710328-12231158  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)156500664X 
035 |a (DE-576)495006645 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ495006645 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hill, Mark  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Limitations on Freedom of Religion and Belief in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Quarter Century since Its Judgment in Kokkinakis v. Greece 
264 1 |c 2017 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The manifestation of religious beliefs under Article 9 the European Convention on Human Rights is not absolute but may be subject to prescribed limitations. This article discusses the nature and extent of those limitations, as interpreted in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights from its decision in Kokkinakis v. Greece up to the present. It contrasts the prescriptive text of the Article with its lose and inconsistent interpretation by the Court in Strasbourg. Particular attention is given to the criteria of “prescribed by law”, “necessary in a democratic society”, “public safety”, “public order, health or morals” and “the rights and freedoms of others”. It seeks to divine principles from the varied jurisprudence, particularly at its intersection with the Court’s illusory doctrine of margin of appreciation. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Kokkinakis  |x freedom of religion  |x Article 9  |x limitations  |x public order  |x rights and freedoms of others  |x margin of appreciation  |x European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)  |x European Convention on Human Rights (echr) 
700 1 |a Barnes, Katherine  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Religion and human rights  |d Leiden : Brill, Nijhoff, 2006  |g 12(2017), 2/3, Seite 174-197  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)518818446  |w (DE-600)2254876-2  |w (DE-576)321221702  |x 1871-0328  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2017  |g number:2/3  |g pages:174-197 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231158  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 12  |j 2017  |e 2/3  |h 174-197 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2986409172 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 156500664X 
LOK |0 005 20171106095849 
LOK |0 008 171106||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL