Die Nederduitse Gereformeerde Kerk en die aanvaarding van sy belydenisskrifte

The Dutch Reformed Church and the content of the acceptance of its confessions In its acceptance of six confessions, the more general confessions from the early church namely the Apostolicum and the Confessions of Nicea and Athanasius as well as the Three Formulas of Unity from the Dutch Reformation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Strauss, P. J. 1951- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Afrikaans
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Stellenbosch University [2016]
In: Stellenbosch theological journal
Jahr: 2015, Band: 1, Heft: 2, Seiten: 667-682
IxTheo Notationen:KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit
KBD Beneluxländer
KDD Evangelische Kirche
weitere Schlagwörter:B Synod of Dordrecht
B Confessions
B qautenus vs. quia
B Nederduitse Gereformeerde Kerk
B Confessionalism
B Dutch Reformed Church
Online Zugang: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Dutch Reformed Church and the content of the acceptance of its confessions In its acceptance of six confessions, the more general confessions from the early church namely the Apostolicum and the Confessions of Nicea and Athanasius as well as the Three Formulas of Unity from the Dutch Reformation, the Dutch Reformed Church follows the footsteps of the National Synod of Dordrecht in 1618-1619. It accepts the formulation or wording of faith in these documents. This wording has authority because (quia) it is according to Scripture. The same church also acknowledges the need for a Scriptural rehearsal of the confessions if needed. By using this basis for the acceptance of the confessions it takes into account the aim and purpose of these documents namely to formulate faith according to Scripture.
ISSN:2413-9467
Enthält:Enthalten in: Stellenbosch theological journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.17570/stj.2015.v1n2.a31