Reflections on the Debate: What Does Philosophy Have to Do with the Cognitive Study of Religion?
Why should the study of religion in general and cognitive study of religion in particular be interested in philosophy in the first place, and vice versa? The paper offers some responses to the debate between John Shook and his respondents. It will suggest that such debates are useful, as it is a phi...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Brill
2017
|
Στο/Στη: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Έτος: 2017, Τόμος: 29, Τεύχος: 4/5, Σελίδες: 429-442 |
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Φιλοσοφία (μοτίβο)
/ Δημόσια συζήτηση
|
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΑΑ Θρησκειολογία AB Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας, Κριτική της θρησκείας, Αθεϊσμός ΑΕ Ψυχολογία της θρησκείας VA Φιλοσοφία |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
cognitive science of religion
philosophy
explanation
debunking arguments
|
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Σύνοψη: | Why should the study of religion in general and cognitive study of religion in particular be interested in philosophy in the first place, and vice versa? The paper offers some responses to the debate between John Shook and his respondents. It will suggest that such debates are useful, as it is a philosophical task to reflect upon the basic assumptions, inference patterns and theories of the study of religion. Furthermore, cognitive study of religion and other approaches in the study of religion should be of great interest to philosophers of religion. The paper puts the debate in a larger context of the dialogue of philosophy and cognitive science of religion and introduces two central themes: debates about psychological explanations and debunking arguments. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341402 |