RT Article
T1 An Assessment of the Uber App’s Normative Practice
JF Philosophia reformata
VO 82
IS 2
SP 192
OP 215
A1 Boshuijzen-van Burken, Christine
A1 Haftor, Darek M.
LA English
PB Brill
YR 2017
UL https://www.ixtheo.de/Record/1566787971
AB This study analyzes a complex case in society, namely, how to distinguish ride-sharing applications, such as Uber, from ordinary taxi enterprises. We conduct a structural analysis of normative practices with distinctions at the following levels: (1) aspects; (2) radical types, genotypes, and phenotypes; (3) part-whole, enkaptic relationships, and interlinkages; and (4) the distinction between qualifying and foundational functions as it is captured in the theory of normative practices. We conclude that the genotype of taxi matchmaking enterprises, of which Uber is an example, represents a novel normativity that could positively serve society and also produce normative challenges, depending on its governance. Therefore, regulators should not dismiss the entire genotype of taxi matchmaking enterprises, but should address the phenotypes that are illegal or that cannot thrive without the illegal behaviors of its users. This conclusion is clear from the structural and directional sides of the practice.
K1 normative practice : enkaptic relationships : Uber : aspects : application-based companies
DO 10.1163/23528230-08202006