Enabling Ivan Karamazov: responding to Mark Murphy's God's Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil
God's Own Ethics introduces a number of philosophical subfields into conversation with philosophy of religion and metaethics in an attempt to discern the ethics of God. While its conception of the divine being is itself controversial, I here take issue with the claim that the divine being descr...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Review |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| Em: |
Religious studies
Ano: 2017, Volume: 53, Número: 4, Páginas: 557-563 |
| Resenha de: | God's own ethics (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2017) (Irwin, Kristen)
|
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Deus
/ Ação moral
/ Sofrimento
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião NBC Deus |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Resenha
|
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | God's Own Ethics introduces a number of philosophical subfields into conversation with philosophy of religion and metaethics in an attempt to discern the ethics of God. While its conception of the divine being is itself controversial, I here take issue with the claim that the divine being described in God's Own Ethics would be one worthy of worship and allegiance. Specifically, I argue that a God lacking in moral perfection of the sort familiar to humans is either unrecognizable as God, or is open to the Ivan Karamazov' objection that such a God deserves neither worship nor allegiance. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Replies to Wielenberg, Irwin, and Draper (2017)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412517000361 |