Online Reactions to the Muhammad Cartoons: YouTube and the Virtual Ummah
The publication of 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on September 30, 2005, created a great deal of controversy over self-censorship, freedom of speech, and accusations of religious incitement. Muslim activists organized protests, and later hundreds o...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
| In: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Anno: 2015, Volume: 54, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 261-276 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten
/ Muḥammad 570-632
/ Vignetta
/ Youtube
/ Reazione
/ Arabo
/ Umma (Religione)
/ Geschichte 2005-
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AD Sociologia delle religioni AG Vita religiosa BJ Islam TK Età contemporanea ZG Scienza dei media; Digitalità; Scienza della comunicazione |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Muhammad cartoons
B Arab social media B e-jihad B Islam B Denmark B Youtube B Arab public sphere |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | The publication of 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on September 30, 2005, created a great deal of controversy over self-censorship, freedom of speech, and accusations of religious incitement. Muslim activists organized protests, and later hundreds of people were killed and hundreds of others were injured due to violent reactions to the cartoons. This article focuses on how people used YouTube to react to these cartoons by analyzing 261 video clips and 4,153 comments. Results show that the majority of the video clips and comments were moderate and positive in tone toward Islam and Muhammad; however, a small percentage either called for jihad against the West or made lethal threats against the artist. Other comments carried curses or insults against Denmark, while a few others were anti-Islamic. The fact that these online reactions were highly varied in tone suggests that the online public sphere is very much divided. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12191 |