Two Epistemological Arguments for the Existence of God
In this article I outline two epistemological theistic arguments. The first one starts from the dilemma between our strong conviction that we possess some knowledge of the world and the belief that there are some serious reasons which undermine it. In my opinion theism opens the possibility of the w...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
Στο/Στη: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Έτος: 2018, Τόμος: 10, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 21-30 |
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Επιστημολογικός συγκειμενισμός
/ Απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού
|
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | AB Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας, Κριτική της θρησκείας, Αθεϊσμός NBC Δόγμα του Θεού |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Epistemology
B theistic arguments B Natural Theology B God |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
Σύνοψη: | In this article I outline two epistemological theistic arguments. The first one starts from the dilemma between our strong conviction that we possess some knowledge of the world and the belief that there are some serious reasons which undermine it. In my opinion theism opens the possibility of the way out of the dilemma. The second argument depends on the premise that in every time every worldly thing is actually perceived or known. I support it by four considerations and claim that the simplest explanation of the epistemic non-loneliness' of the world is the existence of the Supreme Cogniser. |
---|---|
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i1.1889 |