Compassion and responsibility for disease: Trump, tragedy and mercy
Thinking about compassion helps to illuminate what is pernicious and beneficial about emphasizing personal responsibility for health. This article considers whether it is compassionate' to see someone's disease as an embodiment of past faults. Two traditions, one Aristotelian-tragedic and...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Sage
[2018]
|
| В: |
Theology
Год: 2018, Том: 121, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 102-111 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | NBE Антропология NCH Медицинская этика RG Душепопечительство ZD Психология |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Disease
B Aquinas B collaborative deliberation B Compassion B Mercy B Responsibility B Tragedy |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Итог: | Thinking about compassion helps to illuminate what is pernicious and beneficial about emphasizing personal responsibility for health. This article considers whether it is compassionate' to see someone's disease as an embodiment of past faults. Two traditions, one Aristotelian-tragedic and the other Thomist and merciful, yield two ideas of compassion. The argument is that disease should not be conceived as something for which one is responsible in a way which risks the possibility of receiving treatment. But preventive medicine is conceived as a moral endeavour intertwined with the pastoral care of the sick, with discretion as to the manner and timing of any focus on responsibility. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-2696 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040571X17740527 |