The Problem with Evil

This article contends that there are significant theological problems connected with the use of the term “evil” to label states of affairs, and that the “problem with evil” is that we are too quick to presume to know what evil is. If evil is defined as that which is against the good, and the good is...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: McFarland, Ian A. 1963- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage Publ. [2018]
Dans: Theology today
Année: 2018, Volume: 74, Numéro: 4, Pages: 321-339
Classifications IxTheo:NBC Dieu
NBD Création
NBE Anthropologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Theology
B Evil
B GOOD & evil
B Privation
B Theodicy
B Sin
B Good
B EXPECTATION (Philosophy)
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This article contends that there are significant theological problems connected with the use of the term “evil” to label states of affairs, and that the “problem with evil” is that we are too quick to presume to know what evil is. If evil is defined as that which is against the good, and the good is identified with God's will, then the use of “evil” should be restricted to those actions of free creatures that oppose the divine will. The classic understanding of evil as a privation of good will therefore be rejected, on the grounds that it depends on an expectation that the good of individual creatures should conform to a general type. It follows that instances of what is traditionally termed “natural evil” are not properly categorized either as evil or as good, but rather as occasions for the discernment of how God's will for creaturely flourishing is to be realised in a particular context.
ISSN:2044-2556
Contient:Enthalten in: Theology today
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0040573617731711