The Problem with Evil
This article contends that there are significant theological problems connected with the use of the term evil to label states of affairs, and that the problem with evil is that we are too quick to presume to know what evil is. If evil is defined as that which is against the good, and the good is...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Sage Publ.
[2018]
|
В: |
Theology today
Год: 2018, Том: 74, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 321-339 |
Индексация IxTheo: | NBC Бог NBD Сотворение мира NBE Антропология |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Theology
B Evil B GOOD & evil B Privation B Theodicy B Sin B Good B EXPECTATION (Philosophy) |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | This article contends that there are significant theological problems connected with the use of the term evil to label states of affairs, and that the problem with evil is that we are too quick to presume to know what evil is. If evil is defined as that which is against the good, and the good is identified with God's will, then the use of evil should be restricted to those actions of free creatures that oppose the divine will. The classic understanding of evil as a privation of good will therefore be rejected, on the grounds that it depends on an expectation that the good of individual creatures should conform to a general type. It follows that instances of what is traditionally termed natural evil are not properly categorized either as evil or as good, but rather as occasions for the discernment of how God's will for creaturely flourishing is to be realised in a particular context. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2044-2556 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology today
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040573617731711 |