On the East Iranian Genitive Plural Ending
The Khotanese and Sogdian genitive plural endings cannot be satisfactorily explained from the traditionally posited ending *-nām. Instead, Khotanese -nu and Sogdian -nw point to *-nam. Instead of assuming a special rule that shortens the expected *-nām to *-nam, it is argued that the evidence from E...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Brill
2018
|
In: |
Indo-Iranian journal
Anno: 2018, Volume: 61, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 118-130 |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Indo-Iranian reconstruction
historical morphology
genitive plural
East Iranian
Proto-Indo-European
|
Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Verlag) |
Riepilogo: | The Khotanese and Sogdian genitive plural endings cannot be satisfactorily explained from the traditionally posited ending *-nām. Instead, Khotanese -nu and Sogdian -nw point to *-nam. Instead of assuming a special rule that shortens the expected *-nām to *-nam, it is argued that the evidence from East Iranian is to be taken at face value. A short ending *-om can be reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European as well and the East Iranian reflexes of a short ending are probably an archaism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8536 |
Comprende: | In: Indo-Iranian journal
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15728536-06102003 |