Monergistic Molinism
Several philosophers and theologians (including Stump, Cross, Timpe, Keathley, and Evans) have attempted to formulate monergistic, soft libertarian accounts of salvation. These accounts hold that the sinner has the ability to either resist or to do nothing at all with God’s universally given saving...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Sciendo, De Gruyter
2018
|
In: |
Perichoresis
Anno: 2018, Volume: 16, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 77-92 |
Notazioni IxTheo: | KDB Chiesa cattolica NBE Antropologia NBK Soteriologia |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Monergism
Molinism
Pelagianism
soft libertarianism
grace
|
Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Verlag) |
Riepilogo: | Several philosophers and theologians (including Stump, Cross, Timpe, Keathley, and Evans) have attempted to formulate monergistic, soft libertarian accounts of salvation. These accounts hold that the sinner has the ability to either resist or to do nothing at all with God’s universally given saving grace, in which latter case God will save her. However, I wonder with Cyr and Flummer whether these accounts go far enough because the nonresistant sinner voluntarily remains quiescent and is therefore arguably praiseworthy. I aim to remedy this alleged weakness by formulating a possible account on which it never crosses the nonresistant sinner’s mind to resist, making her quiescence an involuntary omission. For all sinners whose minds it crosses to resist, they, on the proposed account, freely choose to resist. Combining Molinism with the scriptural notion of blaspheming against the Holy Spirit, I proceed to explain why it may cross the mind of some sinners and not others to resist. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2284-7308 |
Comprende: | In: Perichoresis
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2478/perc-2018-0012 |