How Much Purer is the "Synopsis Purioris Theologiae"(1625)?: A Comparison of Leiden Disputations before and after Dordt

The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. A...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Stanglin, Keith D. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2018
Dans: Church history and religious culture
Année: 2018, Volume: 98, Numéro: 2, Pages: 195-224
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Synopsis purioris theologiae, disputationibus quinquaginta duabus comprehensa / Dordrechter Synode (1618-1619 : Dordrecht) / Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid / Disputation / Histoire 1596-1625
Classifications IxTheo:FA Théologie
FB Formation théologique
KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance
KBD Benelux
KCC Conciles
KDD Église protestante
Sujets non-standardisés:B Disputations Leiden Arminius, Jacobus Gomarus, Franciscus free choice Synopsis Purioris Theologiae
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. After comparing the disputations with regard to large thematic elements, overall structure, and specific theological topics, it appears that the differences between the two sets of disputations are not as great as might be expected. One must go to hotly debated topics to find differences in the disputations. The Leiden theological handbooks that resulted from the cycles of disputations could, before Dordt, be inconsistent or even incoherent due to the theological diversity within the faculty. What was “purer” after Dordt was a faculty that, on the contested questions of the synod, was uniform in its teaching, a consistency reflected in its theological handbook.
ISSN:1871-2428
Contient:In: Church history and religious culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18712428-09801004