How Much Purer is the "Synopsis Purioris Theologiae"(1625)?: A Comparison of Leiden Disputations before and after Dordt
The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. A...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2018
|
Dans: |
Church history and religious culture
Année: 2018, Volume: 98, Numéro: 2, Pages: 195-224 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Synopsis purioris theologiae, disputationibus quinquaginta duabus comprehensa
/ Dordrechter Synode (1618-1619 : Dordrecht)
/ Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid
/ Disputation
/ Histoire 1596-1625
|
Classifications IxTheo: | FA Théologie FB Formation théologique KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance KBD Benelux KCC Conciles KDD Église protestante |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Disputations
Leiden
Arminius, Jacobus
Gomarus, Franciscus
free choice
Synopsis Purioris Theologiae
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Résumé: | The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. After comparing the disputations with regard to large thematic elements, overall structure, and specific theological topics, it appears that the differences between the two sets of disputations are not as great as might be expected. One must go to hotly debated topics to find differences in the disputations. The Leiden theological handbooks that resulted from the cycles of disputations could, before Dordt, be inconsistent or even incoherent due to the theological diversity within the faculty. What was “purer” after Dordt was a faculty that, on the contested questions of the synod, was uniform in its teaching, a consistency reflected in its theological handbook. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1871-2428 |
Contient: | In: Church history and religious culture
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18712428-09801004 |