How Much Purer is the "Synopsis Purioris Theologiae"(1625)?: A Comparison of Leiden Disputations before and after Dordt

The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. A...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Stanglin, Keith D. (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Brill 2018
В: Church history and religious culture
Год: 2018, Том: 98, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 195-224
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Synopsis purioris theologiae, disputationibus quinquaginta duabus comprehensa / Dordrechter Synode (1618-1619 : Dordrecht) / Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid / Диспут / История (мотив) 1596-1625
Индексация IxTheo:FA Теология
FB Теологическое образование
KAG Реформация
KBD Страны Бенилюкса
KCC Церковный собор
KDD Евангелическая церковь
Другие ключевые слова:B Disputations Leiden Arminius, Jacobus Gomarus, Franciscus free choice Synopsis Purioris Theologiae
Online-ссылка: Volltext (Verlag)
Описание
Итог:The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. After comparing the disputations with regard to large thematic elements, overall structure, and specific theological topics, it appears that the differences between the two sets of disputations are not as great as might be expected. One must go to hotly debated topics to find differences in the disputations. The Leiden theological handbooks that resulted from the cycles of disputations could, before Dordt, be inconsistent or even incoherent due to the theological diversity within the faculty. What was “purer” after Dordt was a faculty that, on the contested questions of the synod, was uniform in its teaching, a consistency reflected in its theological handbook.
ISSN:1871-2428
Второстепенные работы:In: Church history and religious culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18712428-09801004