A Thomistic Analysis of the Hart-Fuller Debate
In 1958, the Harvard Law Review published a now-famous debate between H. L. A. Hart and Lon Fuller regarding the proposed connection between law and morality. Whereas Hart defended a broadly positivist conception of law, Fuller advanced a kind of natural law theory that has greatly influenced judici...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[2015]
|
| Dans: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Année: 2015, Volume: 89, Pages: 277-286 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | KAE Moyen Âge central KAJ Époque contemporaine KBQ Amérique du Nord KDB Église catholique romaine NCA Éthique XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Ethics
B Positivism B Natural Law B THOMAS, Aquinas, Saint, ca. 1225-1274 B LAW reviews |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In 1958, the Harvard Law Review published a now-famous debate between H. L. A. Hart and Lon Fuller regarding the proposed connection between law and morality. Whereas Hart defended a broadly positivist conception of law, Fuller advanced a kind of natural law theory that has greatly influenced judicial interpretation in the United States. This paper examines the debate and provides a commentary in light of the natural law theory of Thomas Aquinas. Whereas it is not surprising that Aquinas would reject the central tenets of Hart's positivism, it also appears he would have deep misgivings about the position defended by Professor Fuller, and particularly Fuller's understanding of how laws should be interpreted in light of morality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2153-7925 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: American Catholic Philosophical Association, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/acpaproc2016112150 |