A Case for the Assimilation of Matthew 21:44 to the Lukan "Crushing Stone" (20:18), with Special Reference to P 104
Modern critical editions enclose Matt 21:44 in brackets due to lingering questions about whether the major witnesses have preserved an early scribal assimilation to Luke 20:18, as it is not present in many Western witnesses. Due to the challenge posed by papyrus discoveries to such "Western non...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
[publisher not identified]
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
TC
Année: 2016, Volume: 21, Pages: 1-21 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Matthäusevangelium 24,44
/ Bibel. Lukasevangelium 20,18
/ Adaptation
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Assimilation (Sociology)
B Assimilation B Interpolation B Transcription B Luke B Matthew B Western Non-Interpolation B ERROR rates B Parable of the Wicked Tenants B Literacy B Papyri B Truth |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Modern critical editions enclose Matt 21:44 in brackets due to lingering questions about whether the major witnesses have preserved an early scribal assimilation to Luke 20:18, as it is not present in many Western witnesses. Due to the challenge posed by papyrus discoveries to such "Western noninterpolations" in recent decades, many scholars now tend to favor the authenticity of this verse in Matthew and reject the assimilation hypothesis along with most other shorter Western readings. This particular text, however, has rarely been studied thoroughly, and recent treatments have not fully dealt with the implications of the second-century fragment P 104 (P.Oxy. XLIV 4404), which appears to lack the verse. This article presents a comprehensive study of the text's external and internal evidence and argues that it is best explained as an early scribal assimilation by (1) providing a detailed transcription of the papyrus that corrects errors in prior versions, (2) presenting new quantitative data on assimilation tendencies among major witnesses, and (3) responding to the internal arguments for the longer reading. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1089-7747 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: TC
|