A Case for the Assimilation of Matthew 21:44 to the Lukan "Crushing Stone" (20:18), with Special Reference to P 104
Modern critical editions enclose Matt 21:44 in brackets due to lingering questions about whether the major witnesses have preserved an early scribal assimilation to Luke 20:18, as it is not present in many Western witnesses. Due to the challenge posed by papyrus discoveries to such "Western non...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
[publisher not identified]
[2016]
|
| В: |
TC
Год: 2016, Том: 21, Страницы: 1-21 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel. Matthäusevangelium 24,44
/ Bibel. Lukasevangelium 20,18
/ Адаптация
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | HC Новый Завет |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Assimilation (Sociology)
B Интерполяция (текст) B Transcription B Luke B Matthew B Western Non-Interpolation B ERROR rates B Parable of the Wicked Tenants B Ассимиляция (фонетика) B Literacy B Papyri B Truth |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | Modern critical editions enclose Matt 21:44 in brackets due to lingering questions about whether the major witnesses have preserved an early scribal assimilation to Luke 20:18, as it is not present in many Western witnesses. Due to the challenge posed by papyrus discoveries to such "Western noninterpolations" in recent decades, many scholars now tend to favor the authenticity of this verse in Matthew and reject the assimilation hypothesis along with most other shorter Western readings. This particular text, however, has rarely been studied thoroughly, and recent treatments have not fully dealt with the implications of the second-century fragment P 104 (P.Oxy. XLIV 4404), which appears to lack the verse. This article presents a comprehensive study of the text's external and internal evidence and argues that it is best explained as an early scribal assimilation by (1) providing a detailed transcription of the papyrus that corrects errors in prior versions, (2) presenting new quantitative data on assimilation tendencies among major witnesses, and (3) responding to the internal arguments for the longer reading. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1089-7747 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: TC
|