Negative Theology in Contemporary Interpretations
The tradition of negative theology has very deep roots which go back to the Late Greek Antiquity and the Early Christian period. Although Dionysius is usually regarded as the Father of negative theology, yet he has not initiated a revolution in the religious philosophy, but rather brought together...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
| Em: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2018, Volume: 10, Número: 2, Páginas: 149-170 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Teologia negativa
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião BE Religiões greco-romanas FD Teologia contextual KAB Cristianismo primitivo |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Transcendence
B Mystical Experience B cataphaticism B Apophaticism B Negative Theology |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | The tradition of negative theology has very deep roots which go back to the Late Greek Antiquity and the Early Christian period. Although Dionysius is usually regarded as the Father of negative theology, yet he has not initiated a revolution in the religious philosophy, but rather brought together various elements of thinking regarding the knowledge of God and built a system which is a synthesis of Platonic, neo-Platonic and Christian ideas. The aim of this article is to illustrate the views of some more modern theologians on the nature, types and levels of apophaticism in the Greek Patristic tradition, trying to establish the role that negation can play in facilitating man's attaining to the knowledge of God. |
|---|---|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i2.1796 |