The eclipse of Daniel's narrative: The limits of historical knowledge in the theological reading of Daniel

This article uses Hans Frei's famous image of the ‘eclipse' of biblical narrative to explore the link between situating the book of Daniel historically and grasping its theological point(s). The critical/conservative stand-off over the book of Daniel is rehearsed by way of key agenda-setti...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Briggs, Richard 1966- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Cambridge Univ. Press [2017]
Em: Scottish journal of theology
Ano: 2017, Volume: 70, Número: 3, Páginas: 264-277
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Bibel. Daniel / Exegese / Historicidade / Teologia
Classificações IxTheo:FA Teologia
HB Antigo Testamento
TC Período pré-cristão
Outras palavras-chave:B Theological Interpretation
B Hans Frei
B F. W. Farrar
B ascriptive reading
B Daniel
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descrição
Resumo:This article uses Hans Frei's famous image of the ‘eclipse' of biblical narrative to explore the link between situating the book of Daniel historically and grasping its theological point(s). The critical/conservative stand-off over the book of Daniel is rehearsed by way of key agenda-setting Victorian voices, and it is then argued that Frei's perspective allows the reader to move on from assessing descriptive accuracy towards focusing on ascriptive purpose(s). Various examples of how such an ascriptive approach might clarify Daniel are considered, including specific attention to the complexities of Daniel 11's problematic relationship to what did and did not happen to Antiochus Epiphanes.
ISSN:1475-3065
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S003693061700028X