The eclipse of Daniel's narrative: The limits of historical knowledge in the theological reading of Daniel
This article uses Hans Frei's famous image of the eclipse' of biblical narrative to explore the link between situating the book of Daniel historically and grasping its theological point(s). The critical/conservative stand-off over the book of Daniel is rehearsed by way of key agenda-setti...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| В: |
Scottish journal of theology
Год: 2017, Том: 70, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 264-277 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel. Daniel
/ Экзегетика
/ Историчность
/ Богословие (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | FA Теология HB Ветхий Завет TC Дохристианское время |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Theological Interpretation
B Hans Frei B F. W. Farrar B ascriptive reading B Daniel |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This article uses Hans Frei's famous image of the eclipse' of biblical narrative to explore the link between situating the book of Daniel historically and grasping its theological point(s). The critical/conservative stand-off over the book of Daniel is rehearsed by way of key agenda-setting Victorian voices, and it is then argued that Frei's perspective allows the reader to move on from assessing descriptive accuracy towards focusing on ascriptive purpose(s). Various examples of how such an ascriptive approach might clarify Daniel are considered, including specific attention to the complexities of Daniel 11's problematic relationship to what did and did not happen to Antiochus Epiphanes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061700028X |